SMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of -104.71% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of 10.08%. NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77% beat Cummins's return on equity of 25.11%.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of $37.59, signalling downside risk potential of -12.54%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $362.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than NuScale Power.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.793%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.2B. NuScale Power's net income of -$14M is lower than Cummins's net income of $824M. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cummins's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 92.25x versus 1.41x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Vernova has a net margin of -104.71% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of 3.16%. NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05%.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of $37.59, signalling downside risk potential of -12.54%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $503.71 which suggests that it could fall by -10.24%. Given that NuScale Power has more downside risk than GE Vernova, analysts believe GE Vernova is more attractive than NuScale Power.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $8B. NuScale Power's net income of -$14M is lower than GE Vernova's net income of $254M. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 80.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 92.25x versus 4.37x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a net margin of -104.71% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of --. NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77% beat Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of --.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of $37.59, signalling downside risk potential of -12.54%. On the other hand Nano Nuclear Energy has an analysts' consensus of $46.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.55%. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than NuScale Power.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nano Nuclear Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Nuclear Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are larger than Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues of --. NuScale Power's net income of -$14M is higher than Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$21.3M. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nano Nuclear Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 92.25x versus -- for Nano Nuclear Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of -104.71% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of -1.81%. NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.7%.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of $37.59, signalling downside risk potential of -12.54%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than NuScale Power.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.996%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $13.4M, which are smaller than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $81.2M. NuScale Power's net income of -$14M is lower than Twin Disc's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 31.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 92.25x versus 0.39x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.