NNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of 3.16%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.61%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $503.71 which suggests that it could fall by -10.24%. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than GE Vernova.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $8B. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$21.3M is lower than GE Vernova's net income of $254M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 80.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 4.37x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -814.55%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.61%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.662%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 9.39x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -7.32%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.61%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.12%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0099999999999989%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$21.3M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 0.41x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -104.71%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $46.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.61%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $37.59 which suggests that it could fall by -18.44%. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $13.4M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$21.3M is lower than NuScale Power's net income of -$14M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 98.93x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.