GEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of 6.46%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71%.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $503.71, signalling downside risk potential of -10.24%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $64.30 which suggests that it could grow by 19.54%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than GE Vernova.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.968%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $73.9M. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.86x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 4.37x versus 1.54x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of 19.91%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $503.71, signalling downside risk potential of -10.24%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $260.71 which suggests that it could fall by -2.05%. Given that GE Vernova has more downside risk than GE Aerospace, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than GE Vernova.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.616%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.86x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 41.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 4.37x versus 7.30x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of --. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of --.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $503.71, signalling downside risk potential of -10.24%. On the other hand Nano Nuclear Energy has an analysts' consensus of $46.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than GE Vernova.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Nano Nuclear Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Nuclear Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues of --. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is higher than Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$21.3M. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.86x while Nano Nuclear Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 4.37x versus -- for Nano Nuclear Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rockwell Automation has a net margin of 3.16% compared to GE Vernova's net margin of 12.59%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05% beat Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.11%.

GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $503.71, signalling downside risk potential of -10.24%. On the other hand Rockwell Automation has an analysts' consensus of $334.63 which suggests that it could fall by -4.85%. Given that GE Vernova has more downside risk than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe Rockwell Automation is more attractive than GE Vernova.

GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.658%.

GE Vernova has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.09%. Rockwell Automation offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. GE Vernova pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation pays out 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GE Vernova quarterly revenues are $8B, which are larger than Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues of $2B. GE Vernova's net income of $254M is higher than Rockwell Automation's net income of $252M. Notably, GE Vernova's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.86x while Rockwell Automation's PE ratio is 44.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Vernova is 4.37x versus 5.02x for Rockwell Automation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.