BE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of 10.08%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Cummins's return on equity of 25.11%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $24.46, signalling downside risk potential of -0.94%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $362.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.225, which suggesting that the stock is 222.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.793%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is lower than Cummins's net income of $824M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cummins's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 3.61x versus 1.41x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -147.12%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $24.46, signalling downside risk potential of -0.94%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.225, which suggesting that the stock is 222.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.257%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 3.61x versus 2.04x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -104.71%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $24.46, signalling downside risk potential of -0.94%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $37.59 which suggests that it could fall by -18.44%. Given that NuScale Power has more downside risk than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Bloom Energy is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.225, which suggesting that the stock is 222.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $13.4M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is lower than NuScale Power's net income of -$14M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 3.61x versus 98.93x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -1.81%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.7%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $24.46, signalling downside risk potential of -0.94%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.53%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.225, which suggesting that the stock is 222.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.996%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $81.2M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is lower than Twin Disc's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 30.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 3.61x versus 0.38x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.