CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Builders FirstSource has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 2.63%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $362.10, signalling upside risk potential of 4.78%. On the other hand Builders FirstSource has an analysts' consensus of $140.19 which suggests that it could grow by 11.26%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.693, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.314%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Builders FirstSource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Builders FirstSource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Cummins's net income of $824M is higher than Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Builders FirstSource's PE ratio is 16.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.41x versus 0.91x for Builders FirstSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 14.06%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $362.10, signalling upside risk potential of 4.78%. On the other hand Caterpillar has an analysts' consensus of $393.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Cummins has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.3%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Caterpillar offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than Caterpillar quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Cummins's net income of $824M is lower than Caterpillar's net income of $2B. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Caterpillar's PE ratio is 20.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.41x versus 3.16x for Caterpillar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 6.79%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $362.10, signalling upside risk potential of 4.78%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $102.45 which suggests that it could grow by 7.4%. Given that PACCAR has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe PACCAR is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.056%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Cummins's net income of $824M is higher than PACCAR's net income of $505.1M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.41x versus 1.55x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gibraltar Industries has a net margin of 10.08% compared to Cummins's net margin of 7.28%. Cummins's return on equity of 25.11% beat Gibraltar Industries's return on equity of 13.42%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $362.10, signalling upside risk potential of 4.78%. On the other hand Gibraltar Industries has an analysts' consensus of $90.33 which suggests that it could grow by 44.05%. Given that Gibraltar Industries has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Gibraltar Industries is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gibraltar Industries has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Gibraltar Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Gibraltar Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Gibraltar Industries quarterly revenues of $290M. Cummins's net income of $824M is higher than Gibraltar Industries's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.19x while Gibraltar Industries's PE ratio is 14.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.41x versus 1.47x for Gibraltar Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.