TWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 10.08%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.7% beat Cummins's return on equity of 25.11%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $362.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Cummins.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.793%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $81.2M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Twin Disc's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Cummins's net income of $824M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.76x while Cummins's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.38x versus 1.41x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 5.54%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.7% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $81.2M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Twin Disc's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.76x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.38x versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of --. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.7% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 27.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2620.811%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $81.2M, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Twin Disc's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.76x while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.38x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -1.81% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of -104.71%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.7% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.53%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $37.59 which suggests that it could fall by -18.44%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $81.2M, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $13.4M. Twin Disc's net income of -$1.5M is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$14M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.76x while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.38x versus 98.93x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.