TROW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 23.88%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $101.31, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $44.43 which suggests that it could fall by -4.43%. Given that Federated Hermes has more downside risk than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.149%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $423.5M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.23x versus 2.20x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of -18.17%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $101.31, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than US Global Investors.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.326%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.23x versus 3.68x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 9.18%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Lazard's return on equity of 44.87%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $101.31, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of $53.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.05%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.906%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. Lazard offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $657.5M. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than Lazard's net income of $60.4M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Lazard's PE ratio is 18.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.23x versus 1.84x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 27.81% compared to T. Rowe Price Group's net margin of 1.3%. T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a consensus price target of $101.31, signalling downside risk potential of -1.69%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $86.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.154%.

T. Rowe Price Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. T. Rowe Price Group pays 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, T. Rowe Price Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.68x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for T. Rowe Price Group is 3.23x versus 1.17x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.