PFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MARA Holdings has a net margin of 1.3% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of -249.29%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $86.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.35 which suggests that it could grow by 4.66%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 552.783%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.17x versus 9.08x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

B. Riley Financial has a net margin of 1.3% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of -14.33%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43% beat B. Riley Financial's return on equity of -37.71%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $86.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand B. Riley Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 516.02%. Given that B. Riley Financial has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe B. Riley Financial is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.448%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. B. Riley Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial pays out -149.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than B. Riley Financial quarterly revenues of $343M. Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M is higher than B. Riley Financial's net income of -$49.2M. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while B. Riley Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.17x versus 0.10x for B. Riley Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 1.3% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of 27.48%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $86.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $99.17 which suggests that it could grow by 7.45%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.442%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.17x versus 5.58x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 1.3% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of 27.81%. Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Principal Financial Group has a consensus price target of $86.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $101.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.006%.

Principal Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Principal Financial Group pays 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Principal Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.28x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Principal Financial Group is 1.17x versus 3.23x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.