Financhill
Buy
89

LAZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$54.17
Seasonality move :
5.17%
Day range:
$51.33 - $52.79
52-week range:
$31.97 - $61.14
Dividend yield:
3.8%
P/E ratio:
18.32x
P/S ratio:
1.84x
P/B ratio:
8.21x
Volume:
939.2K
Avg. volume:
981.1K
1-year change:
16.07%
Market cap:
$5B
Revenue:
$3.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.87

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LAZ
Lazard
$703.5M $0.39 -3.85% -29.16% $53.67
BEN
Franklin Resources
$2.6B $0.49 12.28% 50.8% $23.64
GROW
US Global Investors
-- -- -- -- --
PFG
Principal Financial Group
$4B $1.97 34.95% 33.34% $86.25
SEIC
SEI Investments
$565.6M $1.20 6.12% 8.95% $99.17
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
$1.7B $2.09 -1.11% -5.11% $101.31
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LAZ
Lazard
$52.59 $53.67 $5B 18.32x $0.50 3.8% 1.84x
BEN
Franklin Resources
$24.35 $23.64 $12.8B 35.81x $0.32 5.22% 1.45x
GROW
US Global Investors
$2.43 -- $31.9M 79.78x $0.01 3.7% 3.68x
PFG
Principal Financial Group
$79.82 $86.25 $17.9B 17.28x $0.76 3.71% 1.17x
SEIC
SEI Investments
$92.29 $99.17 $11.5B 20.06x $0.49 1.06% 5.58x
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
$103.05 $101.31 $22.7B 11.68x $1.27 4.87% 3.23x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LAZ
Lazard
73.68% 2.316 40.13% 4.51x
BEN
Franklin Resources
49.71% 1.748 94.27% 3.96x
GROW
US Global Investors
-- 1.091 -- 20.78x
PFG
Principal Financial Group
27.95% 1.118 22.47% 2.92x
SEIC
SEI Investments
-- 1.029 0.02% 5.33x
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
-- 1.730 -- 5.87x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LAZ
Lazard
$227.2M $64.1M 12.35% 44.87% 11.52% -$231.4M
BEN
Franklin Resources
$1.7B $220.9M 1.49% 2.7% 3.01% -$87.6M
GROW
US Global Investors
$813K -$893K 0.34% 0.34% -11.65% -$424K
PFG
Principal Financial Group
-- -- 6.97% 9.43% 0.78% $960.9M
SEIC
SEI Investments
$303.9M $157.1M 26.44% 26.44% 35.65% $130.5M
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group
$922M $625M 18.11% 18.11% 35.43% $550.9M

Lazard vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LAZ or BEN?

    Franklin Resources has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of 7.17%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LAZ
    Lazard
    34.56% $0.56 $2.4B
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    78.88% $0.26 $27.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About LAZ or BEN?

    Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand Franklin Resources has an analysts' consensus of $23.64 which suggests that it could fall by -2.93%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LAZ
    Lazard
    2 3 2
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    2 5 2
  • Is LAZ or BEN More Risky?

    Lazard has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.622%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAZ or BEN?

    Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Franklin Resources offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources pays out 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LAZ or BEN?

    Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are smaller than Franklin Resources quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is lower than Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.32x while Franklin Resources's PE ratio is 35.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.84x versus 1.45x for Franklin Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LAZ
    Lazard
    1.84x 18.32x $657.5M $60.4M
    BEN
    Franklin Resources
    1.45x 35.81x $2.1B $151.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns LAZ or GROW?

    US Global Investors has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of -18.17%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LAZ
    Lazard
    34.56% $0.56 $2.4B
    GROW
    US Global Investors
    38.66% -$0.03 $46.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About LAZ or GROW?

    Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than US Global Investors.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LAZ
    Lazard
    2 3 2
    GROW
    US Global Investors
    0 0 0
  • Is LAZ or GROW More Risky?

    Lazard has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.326%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAZ or GROW?

    Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LAZ or GROW?

    Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.32x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.84x versus 3.68x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LAZ
    Lazard
    1.84x 18.32x $657.5M $60.4M
    GROW
    US Global Investors
    3.68x 79.78x $2.1M -$382K
  • Which has Higher Returns LAZ or PFG?

    Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of 1.3%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LAZ
    Lazard
    34.56% $0.56 $2.4B
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group
    -- $0.21 $15.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About LAZ or PFG?

    Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $86.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Lazard.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LAZ
    Lazard
    2 3 2
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group
    1 6 2
  • Is LAZ or PFG More Risky?

    Lazard has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.154%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAZ or PFG?

    Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LAZ or PFG?

    Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.32x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.84x versus 1.17x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LAZ
    Lazard
    1.84x 18.32x $657.5M $60.4M
    PFG
    Principal Financial Group
    1.17x 17.28x $3.7B $48.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns LAZ or SEIC?

    SEI Investments has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of 27.48%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LAZ
    Lazard
    34.56% $0.56 $2.4B
    SEIC
    SEI Investments
    55.13% $1.17 $2.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About LAZ or SEIC?

    Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $99.17 which suggests that it could grow by 7.45%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Lazard, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Lazard.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LAZ
    Lazard
    2 3 2
    SEIC
    SEI Investments
    2 3 0
  • Is LAZ or SEIC More Risky?

    Lazard has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.442%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAZ or SEIC?

    Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LAZ or SEIC?

    Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.32x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.84x versus 5.58x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LAZ
    Lazard
    1.84x 18.32x $657.5M $60.4M
    SEIC
    SEI Investments
    5.58x 20.06x $551.3M $151.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns LAZ or TROW?

    T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Lazard's net margin of 27.81%. Lazard's return on equity of 44.87% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LAZ
    Lazard
    34.56% $0.56 $2.4B
    TROW
    T. Rowe Price Group
    52.27% $2.15 $11.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About LAZ or TROW?

    Lazard has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 2.05%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $101.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LAZ
    Lazard
    2 3 2
    TROW
    T. Rowe Price Group
    0 10 1
  • Is LAZ or TROW More Risky?

    Lazard has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.006%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAZ or TROW?

    Lazard has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Lazard pays 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LAZ or TROW?

    Lazard quarterly revenues are $657.5M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Lazard's net income of $60.4M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Lazard's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.32x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lazard is 1.84x versus 3.23x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LAZ
    Lazard
    1.84x 18.32x $657.5M $60.4M
    TROW
    T. Rowe Price Group
    3.23x 11.68x $1.8B $490.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?

GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.

Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17

Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock