FHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Resources has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 7.17%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $44.43, signalling downside risk potential of -4.43%. On the other hand Franklin Resources has an analysts' consensus of $23.64 which suggests that it could fall by -2.93%. Given that Federated Hermes has more downside risk than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Franklin Resources is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.622%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Franklin Resources offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Resources pays out 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are smaller than Franklin Resources quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is lower than Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Franklin Resources's PE ratio is 35.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.20x versus 1.45x for Franklin Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of -18.17%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $44.43, signalling downside risk potential of -4.43%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.326%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.20x versus 3.68x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 1.3%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $44.43, signalling downside risk potential of -4.43%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $86.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.154%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.20x versus 1.17x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 27.81%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $44.43, signalling downside risk potential of -4.43%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $101.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that Federated Hermes has more downside risk than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.006%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $423.5M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 2.20x versus 3.23x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.