BEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Apollo Asset Management, Inc. has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 7.97%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Apollo Asset Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.95%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $23.64, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand Apollo Asset Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $159.63 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that Apollo Asset Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Apollo Asset Management, Inc. is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Asset Management, Inc. has a beta of 1.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.646%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Apollo Asset Management, Inc. offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Asset Management, Inc. pays out 25.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Asset Management, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Apollo Asset Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is lower than Apollo Asset Management, Inc.'s net income of $442M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.81x while Apollo Asset Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.45x versus 3.75x for Apollo Asset Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 23.88%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $23.64, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $44.43 which suggests that it could fall by -4.43%. Given that Federated Hermes has more downside risk than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Franklin Resources is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.149%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $423.5M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.81x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.45x versus 2.20x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 9.18%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat Lazard's return on equity of 44.87%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $23.64, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of $53.67 which suggests that it could grow by 2.05%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.906%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Lazard offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $657.5M. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is higher than Lazard's net income of $60.4M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.81x while Lazard's PE ratio is 18.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.45x versus 1.84x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 7.17% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 27.81%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 2.7% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $23.64, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $101.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that Franklin Resources has more downside risk than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.006%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Franklin Resources's net income of $151.4M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.81x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.45x versus 3.23x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.