TXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of -0.19%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Textron has a consensus price target of $87.05, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $235.93 which suggests that it could grow by 2.62%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Boeing.

Textron has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.564%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Textron's net income of $207M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.14x versus 2.26x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of 8.13%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $87.05, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $305.31 which suggests that it could grow by 1.77%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Textron has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.462%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Textron's net income of $207M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.14x versus 1.69x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of 17.71%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 28.27%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $87.05, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $183.10 which suggests that it could fall by -0.65%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Textron has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.002%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Textron's net income of $207M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $344M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 60.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.14x versus 9.99x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Textron's net margin of 9.53%. Textron's return on equity of 11.79% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $87.05, signalling upside risk potential of 3.46%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.72 which suggests that it could grow by 11.29%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Textron, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Textron.

Textron has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.965%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Textron's net income of $207M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.04x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 1.14x versus 1.56x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.