AVAV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 6.06% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 9.53%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.1% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $257.66, signalling downside risk potential of -4.19%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.72 which suggests that it could grow by 11.29%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than AeroVironment, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than AeroVironment.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.965%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $275.1M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. AeroVironment's net income of $16.7M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 173.50x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 9.23x versus 1.56x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of 6.06% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of -49.46%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.1% beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -47.64%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $257.66, signalling downside risk potential of -4.19%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $36.96 which suggests that it could fall by -22.51%. Given that Rocket Lab USA has more downside risk than AeroVironment, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Rocket Lab USA.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $275.1M, which are larger than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $122.6M. AeroVironment's net income of $16.7M is higher than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$60.6M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 173.50x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 9.23x versus 51.15x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 6.06% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 7.56%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.1% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $257.66, signalling downside risk potential of -4.19%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $148.93 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that AeroVironment has more downside risk than RTX, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than AeroVironment.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.001%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $275.1M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. AeroVironment's net income of $16.7M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 173.50x while RTX's PE ratio is 44.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 9.23x versus 2.48x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 6.06% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 6.26%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.1% beat Textron's return on equity of 11.79%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $257.66, signalling downside risk potential of -4.19%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $87.05 which suggests that it could grow by 3.46%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than AeroVironment, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than AeroVironment.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.657%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Textron offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $275.1M, which are smaller than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.3B. AeroVironment's net income of $16.7M is lower than Textron's net income of $207M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 173.50x while Textron's PE ratio is 19.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 9.23x versus 1.14x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.