GD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 5.45%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $305.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.77%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $260.68 which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.954%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are larger than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is higher than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.80x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 18.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.69x versus 0.87x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 7.52%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $305.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.77%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $270.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.65%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.094%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.1B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.80x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 30.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.69x versus 2.34x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 9.53%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $305.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.77%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.81 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.965%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.80x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.69x versus 1.56x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 8.13% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 7.56%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $305.31, signalling upside risk potential of 1.77%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $147.79 which suggests that it could fall by -0.78%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than RTX.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.001%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. RTX offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $12.2B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. General Dynamics's net income of $994M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.80x while RTX's PE ratio is 43.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.69x versus 2.45x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.