SNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 5.45%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $322.39, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $260.68 which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that Snap-on has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Snap-on is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.954%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 18.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.58x versus 0.87x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 6.47%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $322.39, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.19 which suggests that it could fall by -8.88%. Given that Snap-on has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Snap-on is more attractive than Kennametal.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.400, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.029%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.58x versus 0.96x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 11.8%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $322.39, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $213.72 which suggests that it could fall by -2.33%. Given that Snap-on has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Snap-on is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.199, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.92%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 26.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.58x versus 3.09x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 21.08% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 2.41%. Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $322.39, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $86.14 which suggests that it could grow by 23.92%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.757, which suggesting that the stock is 24.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.876%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Snap-on's net income of $240.5M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is 28.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.58x versus 0.69x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.