ESAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 9.93% compared to ESAB's net margin of -16.81%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.01% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.56, signalling upside risk potential of 3.03%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47727268.19%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.375%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $678.1M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. ESAB's net income of $67.4M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.20x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.91x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 9.93% compared to ESAB's net margin of 11.8%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.01% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.56, signalling upside risk potential of 3.03%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $213.72 which suggests that it could fall by -4.07%. Given that ESAB has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe ESAB is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.199, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.92%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $678.1M, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. ESAB's net income of $67.4M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.20x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 27.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.91x versus 3.15x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap-on has a net margin of 9.93% compared to ESAB's net margin of 21.08%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.01% beat Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.56, signalling upside risk potential of 3.03%. On the other hand Snap-on has an analysts' consensus of $324.39 which suggests that it could fall by -3.97%. Given that ESAB has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe ESAB is more attractive than Snap-on.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap-on has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.331%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Snap-on offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on pays out 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $678.1M, which are smaller than Snap-on quarterly revenues of $1.1B. ESAB's net income of $67.4M is lower than Snap-on's net income of $240.5M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.20x while Snap-on's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.91x versus 3.87x for Snap-on. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ToughBuilt Industries has a net margin of 9.93% compared to ESAB's net margin of --. ESAB's return on equity of 15.01% beat ToughBuilt Industries's return on equity of --.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.56, signalling upside risk potential of 3.03%. On the other hand ToughBuilt Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21566.69%. Given that ToughBuilt Industries has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe ToughBuilt Industries is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ToughBuilt Industries has a beta of 2.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.523%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. ToughBuilt Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. ToughBuilt Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $678.1M, which are larger than ToughBuilt Industries quarterly revenues of --. ESAB's net income of $67.4M is higher than ToughBuilt Industries's net income of --. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.20x while ToughBuilt Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.91x versus 0.00x for ToughBuilt Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.