HII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.52%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $260.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $273.22 which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 68.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.094%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.87x versus 2.36x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 9.53%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $260.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $524.72 which suggests that it could grow by 11.29%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 68.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.965%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.87x versus 1.56x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northrop Grumman has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 5.08%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $260.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand Northrop Grumman has an analysts' consensus of $553.19 which suggests that it could grow by 6.45%. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 68.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.743%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Northrop Grumman offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman pays out 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while Northrop Grumman's PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.87x versus 1.88x for Northrop Grumman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 5.45% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.56%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $260.68, signalling upside risk potential of 2.7%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $148.93 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than RTX.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.310, which suggesting that the stock is 68.954% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.001%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. RTX offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.29x while RTX's PE ratio is 44.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.87x versus 2.48x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.