PH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Generac Holdings has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 4.65%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $735.74, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $152.01 which suggests that it could grow by 3.6%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.722, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.201%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $942.1M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is higher than Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 25.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.68x versus 2.03x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 7.4%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $735.74, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand Gorman-Rupp has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.13%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.339%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Gorman-Rupp offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues of $163.9M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is higher than Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Gorman-Rupp's PE ratio is 21.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.68x versus 1.46x for Gorman-Rupp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Illinois Tool Works has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 18.23%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat Illinois Tool Works's return on equity of 105.72%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $735.74, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand Illinois Tool Works has an analysts' consensus of $250.78 which suggests that it could fall by -2.35%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than Illinois Tool Works, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than Illinois Tool Works.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.28%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Illinois Tool Works offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Illinois Tool Works pays out 48.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Illinois Tool Works quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is higher than Illinois Tool Works's net income of $700M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Illinois Tool Works's PE ratio is 22.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.68x versus 4.83x for Illinois Tool Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 19.37% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 7.56%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $735.74, signalling upside risk potential of 3.59%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $148.93 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than RTX.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.337, which suggesting that the stock is 33.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.001%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. RTX offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while RTX's PE ratio is 44.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.68x versus 2.48x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.