GNRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Power Group has a net margin of 4.65% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of --. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24% beat American Power Group's return on equity of --.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $152.01, signalling upside risk potential of 3.6%. On the other hand American Power Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than American Power Group, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than American Power Group.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.722, which suggesting that the stock is 72.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Power Group has a beta of -0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.967%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Power Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Power Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are larger than American Power Group quarterly revenues of --. Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M is higher than American Power Group's net income of --. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while American Power Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 2.03x versus 0.41x for American Power Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aura Systems has a net margin of 4.65% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of -213000%. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24% beat Aura Systems's return on equity of --.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $152.01, signalling upside risk potential of 3.6%. On the other hand Aura Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.722, which suggesting that the stock is 72.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.006%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aura Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are larger than Aura Systems quarterly revenues of $3K. Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M is higher than Aura Systems's net income of -$540K. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while Aura Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 2.03x versus 237.27x for Aura Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of 4.65% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of 6.8%. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24% beat Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.16%.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $152.01, signalling upside risk potential of 3.6%. On the other hand Franklin Electric has an analysts' consensus of $97.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.04%. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than Generac Holdings, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than Generac Holdings.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.722, which suggesting that the stock is 72.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.4%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Electric offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are larger than Franklin Electric quarterly revenues of $455.2M. Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M is higher than Franklin Electric's net income of $31M. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while Franklin Electric's PE ratio is 23.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 2.03x versus 2.07x for Franklin Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 4.65% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of 4.04%. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 14.24% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.67%.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $152.01, signalling upside risk potential of 3.6%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $176.77 which suggests that it could grow by 21.11%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Generac Holdings, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Generac Holdings.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.722, which suggesting that the stock is 72.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.128, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.812%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $942.1M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Generac Holdings's net income of $43.8M is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $57.3M. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.56x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 41.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 2.03x versus 1.65x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.