GRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Omega Flex has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 15.29%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.13%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.173, which suggesting that the stock is 17.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.361, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.929%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $23.3M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 19.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.46x versus 3.37x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 16.61%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.54%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.13%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $429.57 which suggests that it could grow by 10.27%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.173, which suggesting that the stock is 17.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.654, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.406%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 6.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are smaller than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $437.7M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is lower than RBC Bearings's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 50.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.46x versus 7.23x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 6.92%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 3.56%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.13%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.7%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Gorman-Rupp, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Gorman-Rupp.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.173, which suggesting that the stock is 17.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.086%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 6.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 172.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands's is not.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $140.8M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $9.7M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 30.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.46x versus 0.77x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 8.17%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.53%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.13%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $142.07 which suggests that it could grow by 8.93%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Xylem, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Xylem.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.173, which suggesting that the stock is 17.339% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.974%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 39.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is lower than Xylem's net income of $169M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Xylem's PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.46x versus 3.70x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.