PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caterpillar has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 14.06%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $102.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Caterpillar has an analysts' consensus of $393.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that PACCAR has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe PACCAR is more attractive than Caterpillar.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.3%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Caterpillar offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Caterpillar quarterly revenues of $14.2B. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is lower than Caterpillar's net income of $2B. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.45x while Caterpillar's PE ratio is 20.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.55x versus 3.16x for Caterpillar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cummins has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 10.08%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Cummins's return on equity of 25.11%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $102.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $362.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that PACCAR has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe PACCAR is more attractive than Cummins.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.793%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.2B. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is lower than Cummins's net income of $824M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.45x while Cummins's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.55x versus 1.41x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 4.85%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $102.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $126.62 which suggests that it could grow by 2.83%. Given that PACCAR has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe PACCAR is more attractive than Oshkosh.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.228%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.3B. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.45x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 13.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.55x versus 0.77x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -173.26%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Xos's return on equity of -104.41%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $102.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.4%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.64%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $5.9M. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.45x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.55x versus 0.55x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.