BLBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 6.46%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 69.97% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.44%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $64.30 which suggests that it could grow by 19.54%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Flowserve.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.968%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $358.9M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Blue Bird's net income of $26M is lower than Flowserve's net income of $73.9M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.26x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.05x versus 1.54x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 4.85%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 69.97% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.44%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $126.62 which suggests that it could grow by 2.83%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.228%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $358.9M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Blue Bird's net income of $26M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.26x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 13.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.05x versus 0.77x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 6.79%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 69.97% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.44%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $102.45 which suggests that it could grow by 7.4%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than PACCAR.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.056%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $358.9M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Blue Bird's net income of $26M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $505.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.26x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.05x versus 1.55x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -173.26%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 69.97% beat Xos's return on equity of -104.41%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.44%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.64%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Blue Bird.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $358.9M, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Blue Bird's net income of $26M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.26x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.05x versus 0.55x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.