HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.26%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $28.78, signalling upside risk potential of 35.51%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $46.52 which suggests that it could grow by 20.26%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.724%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Halliburton's net income of $204M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 13.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.83x versus 1.39x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chevron has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.59%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $28.78, signalling upside risk potential of 35.51%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $164.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Chevron.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.023%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Halliburton's net income of $204M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while Chevron's PE ratio is 17.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.83x versus 1.39x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 34.86%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $28.78, signalling upside risk potential of 35.51%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.20 which suggests that it could grow by 33.51%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.052%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Halliburton's net income of $204M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.83x versus 2.57x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 9.39%. Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56% beat SLB's return on equity of 19.04%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $28.78, signalling upside risk potential of 35.51%. On the other hand SLB has an analysts' consensus of $46.70 which suggests that it could grow by 35.02%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than SLB, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than SLB.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.91399999999999%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.2%. SLB offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than SLB quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Halliburton's net income of $204M is lower than SLB's net income of $797M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.89x while SLB's PE ratio is 11.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.83x versus 1.36x for SLB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.