FANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 11.1%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $182.20, signalling upside risk potential of 33.51%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $43.94 which suggests that it could grow by 38.38%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.867%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.57x versus 1.20x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 13.76%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.25%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $182.20, signalling upside risk potential of 33.51%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $50.73 which suggests that it could grow by 19.01%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.79%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $936M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 17.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.57x versus 1.51x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sitio Royalties has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 6.28%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Sitio Royalties's return on equity of 1.26%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $182.20, signalling upside risk potential of 33.51%. On the other hand Sitio Royalties has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 46.26%. Given that Sitio Royalties has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Sitio Royalties is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sitio Royalties has a beta of 1.401, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.149%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Sitio Royalties offers a yield of 7.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sitio Royalties pays out 296.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sitio Royalties's is not.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Sitio Royalties quarterly revenues of $163.5M. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than Sitio Royalties's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Sitio Royalties's PE ratio is 34.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.57x versus 2.21x for Sitio Royalties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 9.52%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $182.20, signalling upside risk potential of 33.51%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.052% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.57x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.