BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flotek Industries has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 9.72%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 12.95%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.724% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.582%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $55.4M. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is higher than Flotek Industries's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.20x while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 28.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.39x versus 1.98x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 3.77%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $28.78 which suggests that it could grow by 35.51%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.724% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.907%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is higher than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.20x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.39x versus 0.83x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLB has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 9.39%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat SLB's return on equity of 19.04%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand SLB has an analysts' consensus of $46.70 which suggests that it could grow by 35.02%. Given that SLB has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe SLB is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.724% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.91399999999999%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. SLB offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than SLB quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is lower than SLB's net income of $797M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.20x while SLB's PE ratio is 11.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.39x versus 1.36x for SLB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 9.52%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $46.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.49 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.724% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.08%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Baker Hughes's net income of $402M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.20x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.39x versus 1.45x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.