FLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 13.76%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -3.68%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.04%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.365%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.12x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 0.96x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of -4.81%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 11.94%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -3.68%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could grow by 8.31%. Given that Granite Construction has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Granite Construction is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.464%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $699.5M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Granite Construction's net income of -$33.7M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.12x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 39.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 1.17x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of -0.75%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -3.68%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.91%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.304%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.12x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 172.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 0.38x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -6.05% compared to Fluor's net margin of 9.16%. Fluor's return on equity of 64.65% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $51.94, signalling downside risk potential of -3.68%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $256.33 which suggests that it could grow by 2.25%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.296%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $430.9M. Fluor's net income of -$241M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.12x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 29.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.56x versus 3.69x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.