GLDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of -6.05%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Fluor's return on equity of 64.65%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.29%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $51.94 which suggests that it could fall by -2.94%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.293%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4B. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is higher than Fluor's net income of -$241M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while Fluor's PE ratio is 5.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.94x versus 0.56x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of -4.81%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 11.94%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.29%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.02%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.464%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $699.5M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is higher than Granite Construction's net income of -$33.7M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 38.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.94x versus 1.15x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of -0.75%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.29%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.76%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Orion Group Holdings, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Orion Group Holdings.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.304%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 172.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.94x versus 0.38x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 13.76% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 9.16%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.29%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $256.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.296%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are smaller than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $430.9M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 28.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.94x versus 3.58x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.