ACA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -6.05%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.23% beat Fluor's return on equity of 64.65%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 24.15%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $51.94 which suggests that it could fall by -3.68%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Fluor.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.293%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $632M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4B. Arcosa's net income of $23.6M is higher than Fluor's net income of -$241M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.65x while Fluor's PE ratio is 5.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.69x versus 0.56x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 13.76%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.23% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 24.15%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.04%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.365%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $632M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Arcosa's net income of $23.6M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.65x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.69x versus 0.96x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -0.75%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.23% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of 2.24%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 24.15%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.91%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.304%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $632M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.7M. Arcosa's net income of $23.6M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.65x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is 172.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.69x versus 0.38x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 9.16%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.23% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.76%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 24.15%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $256.33 which suggests that it could grow by 2.25%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.991, which suggesting that the stock is 0.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.296%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $632M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $430.9M. Arcosa's net income of $23.6M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $39.5M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.65x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 29.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.69x versus 3.69x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.