NOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Equifax has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of 9.23%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat Equifax's return on equity of 12.43%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $553.19, signalling upside risk potential of 6.45%. On the other hand Equifax has an analysts' consensus of $289.83 which suggests that it could grow by 11.76%. Given that Equifax has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe Equifax is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.153, which suggesting that the stock is 84.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equifax has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.46%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Equifax offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Equifax pays out 31.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Equifax quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than Equifax's net income of $133.1M. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while Equifax's PE ratio is 53.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.88x versus 5.65x for Equifax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iveda Solutions has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of -53.82%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat Iveda Solutions's return on equity of -98.46%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $553.19, signalling upside risk potential of 6.45%. On the other hand Iveda Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 227.87%. Given that Iveda Solutions has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe Iveda Solutions is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.153, which suggesting that the stock is 84.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iveda Solutions has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.691%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Iveda Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Iveda Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Iveda Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than Iveda Solutions's net income of -$793.7K. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while Iveda Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.88x versus 0.82x for Iveda Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of 23.03%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 26.3%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $553.19, signalling upside risk potential of 6.45%. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $30.08 which suggests that it could fall by -1.4%. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than NAPCO Security Technologies, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than NAPCO Security Technologies.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.153, which suggesting that the stock is 84.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.552%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $44M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $10.1M. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 25.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.88x versus 6.20x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of -16.92%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -26.44%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $553.19, signalling upside risk potential of 6.45%. On the other hand Universal Security Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.153, which suggesting that the stock is 84.743% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Security Instruments has a beta of -0.086, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.55%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Universal Security Instruments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Security Instruments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than Universal Security Instruments's net income of -$936.6K. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.52x while Universal Security Instruments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.88x versus 0.34x for Universal Security Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.