BTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Natural Resources has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of --. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat Core Natural Resources's return on equity of --.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $17.93, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand Core Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of $99.80 which suggests that it could grow by 37.64%. Given that Core Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Peabody Energy, analysts believe Core Natural Resources is more attractive than Peabody Energy.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.679%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Core Natural Resources offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Natural Resources pays out 5.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than Core Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is higher than Core Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while Core Natural Resources's PE ratio is 14.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus 0.96x for Core Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 8.47%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -94.19%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $17.93, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 37.59%. Given that Hallador Energy has higher upside potential than Peabody Energy, analysts believe Hallador Energy is more attractive than Peabody Energy.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.751%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $117.8M. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of $10M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus 1.54x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 7.47%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of 8.62%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $17.93, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.15%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than NACCO Industries, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than NACCO Industries.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.74%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out 19.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $65.6M. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus 1.17x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 72.29%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 31.24%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $17.93, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand Natural Resources Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -84.62%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.519, which suggesting that the stock is 48.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.333%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Natural Resources Partners LP offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP pays out 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is lower than Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $40.3M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.49x while Natural Resources Partners LP's PE ratio is 9.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.49x versus 5.63x for Natural Resources Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.