CNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Peabody Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Core Natural Resources's net margin of 3.67%. Core Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96%.

Core Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $99.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.47%. On the other hand Peabody Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.93 which suggests that it could grow by 11.77%. Given that Core Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Peabody Energy, analysts believe Core Natural Resources is more attractive than Peabody Energy.

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.067%.

Core Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Peabody Energy offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Core Natural Resources pays 5.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Core Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Peabody Energy quarterly revenues of $937M. Core Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M. Notably, Core Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while Peabody Energy's PE ratio is 5.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Natural Resources is 1.00x versus 0.54x for Peabody Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CKX Lands has a net margin of -- compared to Core Natural Resources's net margin of 33.19%. Core Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 4.15%.

Core Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $99.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.47%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Core Natural Resources has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Core Natural Resources is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of -0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.398%.

Core Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Natural Resources pays 5.54% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Natural Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Core Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $348.2K. Core Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than CKX Lands's net income of $115.6K. Notably, Core Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 33.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Natural Resources is 1.00x versus 14.89x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum has a net margin of -- compared to Core Natural Resources's net margin of -38.8%. Core Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat Empire Petroleum's return on equity of -56.67%.

Core Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $99.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.47%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Core Natural Resources has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum, analysts believe Core Natural Resources is more attractive than Empire Petroleum.

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.656%.

Core Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Empire Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Natural Resources pays 5.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Natural Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Core Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Empire Petroleum quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Core Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than Empire Petroleum's net income of -$4M. Notably, Core Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while Empire Petroleum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Natural Resources is 1.00x versus 2.94x for Empire Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smart Sand has a net margin of -- compared to Core Natural Resources's net margin of -36.96%. Core Natural Resources's return on equity of -- beat Smart Sand's return on equity of -8.81%.

Core Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $99.80, signalling upside risk potential of 32.47%. On the other hand Smart Sand has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.52%. Given that Smart Sand has higher upside potential than Core Natural Resources, analysts believe Smart Sand is more attractive than Core Natural Resources.

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.683, which suggesting that the stock is 31.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Sand has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.888%.

Core Natural Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Smart Sand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Core Natural Resources pays 5.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Sand pays out 130.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Natural Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smart Sand's is not.

Core Natural Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Smart Sand quarterly revenues of $65.6M. Core Natural Resources's net income of -- is lower than Smart Sand's net income of -$24.2M. Notably, Core Natural Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while Smart Sand's PE ratio is 28.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Natural Resources is 1.00x versus 0.26x for Smart Sand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.