ARLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Peabody Energy has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of 3.67%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 14.62% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand Peabody Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.93 which suggests that it could grow by 21.8%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Alliance Resource Partners LP, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Alliance Resource Partners LP.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.067%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.36%. Peabody Energy offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 100.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alliance Resource Partners LP's is not.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $540.5M, which are smaller than Peabody Energy quarterly revenues of $937M. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $74M is higher than Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.75x while Peabody Energy's PE ratio is 5.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.48x versus 0.49x for Peabody Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of 8.47%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 14.62% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -94.19%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 37.59%. Given that Hallador Energy has higher upside potential than Alliance Resource Partners LP, analysts believe Hallador Energy is more attractive than Alliance Resource Partners LP.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.751%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.36%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 100.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $540.5M, which are larger than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $117.8M. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $74M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of $10M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.75x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.48x versus 1.54x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of 7.47%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 14.62% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of 8.62%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.15%. Given that Alliance Resource Partners LP has higher upside potential than NACCO Industries, analysts believe Alliance Resource Partners LP is more attractive than NACCO Industries.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.74%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.36%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 100.71% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out 19.63% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alliance Resource Partners LP's is not.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $540.5M, which are larger than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $65.6M. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $74M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.75x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.48x versus 1.17x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a net margin of 13.69% compared to Alliance Resource Partners LP's net margin of 72.29%. Alliance Resource Partners LP's return on equity of 14.62% beat Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 31.24%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.03%. On the other hand Natural Resources Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -84.62%. Given that Alliance Resource Partners LP has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Alliance Resource Partners LP is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.333%.

Alliance Resource Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.36%. Natural Resources Partners LP offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Alliance Resource Partners LP pays 100.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP pays out 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alliance Resource Partners LP's is not.

Alliance Resource Partners LP quarterly revenues are $540.5M, which are larger than Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Alliance Resource Partners LP's net income of $74M is higher than Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $40.3M. Notably, Alliance Resource Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.75x while Natural Resources Partners LP's PE ratio is 9.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alliance Resource Partners LP is 1.48x versus 5.63x for Natural Resources Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.