UUUU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Centrus Energy has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of 37.21%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 94.73%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.06, signalling downside risk potential of -2.15%. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $189.63 which suggests that it could fall by -16.56%. Given that Centrus Energy has more downside risk than Energy Fuels, analysts believe Energy Fuels is more attractive than Centrus Energy.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.474%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $73.1M. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is lower than Centrus Energy's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 35.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 21.67x versus 8.01x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PrimeEnergy Resources has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of 18.5%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat PrimeEnergy Resources's return on equity of 27.51%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.06, signalling downside risk potential of -2.15%. On the other hand PrimeEnergy Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than PrimeEnergy Resources, analysts believe Energy Fuels is more attractive than PrimeEnergy Resources.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.167, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.294%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PrimeEnergy Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PrimeEnergy Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than PrimeEnergy Resources quarterly revenues of $49.4M. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is lower than PrimeEnergy Resources's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PrimeEnergy Resources's PE ratio is 7.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 21.67x versus 1.60x for PrimeEnergy Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uranium Energy has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of -20.57%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.06, signalling downside risk potential of -2.15%. On the other hand Uranium Energy has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 29.42%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Fuels, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Energy Fuels.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.829%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uranium Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uranium Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than Uranium Energy quarterly revenues of $49.8M. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is higher than Uranium Energy's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uranium Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 21.67x versus 47.17x for Uranium Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of -155.62% compared to Energy Fuels's net margin of 30.61%. Energy Fuels's return on equity of -17.16% beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68%.

Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $8.06, signalling downside risk potential of -2.15%. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.56%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Fuels, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Energy Fuels.

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.791% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.713%.

Energy Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 6.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Energy Fuels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Fuels quarterly revenues are $16.9M, which are smaller than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $245M. Energy Fuels's net income of -$26.3M is lower than Viper Energy's net income of $75M. Notably, Energy Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 9.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Fuels is 21.67x versus 4.16x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.