UEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hallador Energy has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 8.47%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -94.19%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 29.42%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 37.59%. Given that Hallador Energy has higher upside potential than Uranium Energy, analysts believe Hallador Energy is more attractive than Uranium Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.751%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are smaller than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $117.8M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Hallador Energy's net income of $10M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus 1.54x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 0.16%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 29.42%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $21.38 which suggests that it could grow by 37.11%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Uranium Energy, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Uranium Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.446%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 6.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $1B. Uranium Energy's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 7.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus 0.50x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 37.21%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 94.73%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 29.42%. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $189.63 which suggests that it could fall by -16.56%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Centrus Energy, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Centrus Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.474%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are smaller than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $73.1M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Centrus Energy's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 35.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus 8.01x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sable Offshore has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of --. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat Sable Offshore's return on equity of --.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $9.88, signalling upside risk potential of 29.42%. On the other hand Sable Offshore has an analysts' consensus of $41.60 which suggests that it could grow by 88.49%. Given that Sable Offshore has higher upside potential than Uranium Energy, analysts believe Sable Offshore is more attractive than Uranium Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sable Offshore has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sable Offshore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sable Offshore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are larger than Sable Offshore quarterly revenues of --. Uranium Energy's net income of -$30.2M is higher than Sable Offshore's net income of -$109.5M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sable Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus -- for Sable Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.