VNOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Stone Minerals LP has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 13.84%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 19.6%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.56%. On the other hand Black Stone Minerals LP has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.78%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Black Stone Minerals LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Black Stone Minerals LP.

Viper Energy has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.235%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Black Stone Minerals LP offers a yield of 11.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Stone Minerals LP pays out 134.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are larger than Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues of $115.3M. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is higher than Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $15.9M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Black Stone Minerals LP's PE ratio is 13.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.16x versus 6.20x for Black Stone Minerals LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.56%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.20 which suggests that it could grow by 33.51%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Viper Energy has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.052%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.16x versus 2.57x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flotek Industries has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 9.72%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 12.95%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.56%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Viper Energy has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.582%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $55.4M. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is higher than Flotek Industries's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 28.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.16x versus 1.98x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sitio Royalties has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 6.28%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat Sitio Royalties's return on equity of 1.26%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.56%. On the other hand Sitio Royalties has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 46.26%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Sitio Royalties, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Sitio Royalties.

Viper Energy has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.713% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sitio Royalties has a beta of 1.401, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.149%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Sitio Royalties offers a yield of 7.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Sitio Royalties pays out 296.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are larger than Sitio Royalties quarterly revenues of $163.5M. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is higher than Sitio Royalties's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Sitio Royalties's PE ratio is 34.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.16x versus 2.21x for Sitio Royalties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.