INUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 24.04%. Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 160.62%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $315.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.02%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, which suggesting that the stock is 53.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.887%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.78x versus 6.45x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 9.31%. Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 160.62%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $340.21 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Autodesk.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, which suggesting that the stock is 53.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.944%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 61.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.78x versus 9.89x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BigCommerce Holdings has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -0.43%. Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12% beat BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 160.62%. On the other hand BigCommerce Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 53.69%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than BigCommerce Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than BigCommerce Holdings.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, which suggesting that the stock is 53.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BigCommerce Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BigCommerce Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues of $82.4M. Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M is lower than BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BigCommerce Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.78x versus 1.14x for BigCommerce Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WM Technology has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 3.69%. Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12% beat WM Technology's return on equity of 7%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $13.50, signalling upside risk potential of 160.62%. On the other hand WM Technology has an analysts' consensus of $2.61 which suggests that it could grow by 175.9%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Inuvo.

Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, which suggesting that the stock is 53.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.26%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WM Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WM Technology pays out 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than WM Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M is lower than WM Technology's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WM Technology's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.78x versus 0.51x for WM Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.