ADP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 22.02%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $315.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.02%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $328.11 which suggests that it could grow by 4.3%. Given that Automatic Data Processing has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Automatic Data Processing is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.194%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B is higher than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 79.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.45x versus 17.67x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 3.24%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $315.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.02%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $143.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3.23%. Given that Automatic Data Processing has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Automatic Data Processing is more attractive than Datadog.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.629%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B is higher than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Datadog's PE ratio is 302.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.45x versus 17.70x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 36.86%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $315.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.02%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $533.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.45x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 26.28%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53% beat Paycom Software's return on equity of 25.86%.

Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $315.34, signalling upside risk potential of 5.02%. On the other hand Paycom Software has an analysts' consensus of $240.82 which suggests that it could grow by 7.87%. Given that Paycom Software has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Paycom Software is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software has a beta of 0.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.669%.

Automatic Data Processing has a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Paycom Software offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Automatic Data Processing pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software pays out 16.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Paycom Software quarterly revenues of $530.5M. Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B is higher than Paycom Software's net income of $139.4M. Notably, Automatic Data Processing's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Paycom Software's PE ratio is 31.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Automatic Data Processing is 6.45x versus 6.57x for Paycom Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.