BIGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 24.04%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 53.69%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $315.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.02%. Given that BigCommerce Holdings has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe BigCommerce Holdings is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.887%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.14x versus 6.45x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Braze has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of -22.08%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat Braze's return on equity of -22.62%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 53.69%. On the other hand Braze has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.38%. Given that Braze has higher upside potential than BigCommerce Holdings, analysts believe Braze is more attractive than BigCommerce Holdings.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Braze has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Braze offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Braze pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are smaller than Braze quarterly revenues of $162.1M. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is higher than Braze's net income of -$35.8M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Braze's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.14x versus 4.52x for Braze. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of -4.72%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 53.69%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 160.62%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than BigCommerce Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than BigCommerce Holdings.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.14x versus 0.78x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WM Technology has a net margin of -0.43% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 3.69%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -68.39% beat WM Technology's return on equity of 7%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 53.69%. On the other hand WM Technology has an analysts' consensus of $2.61 which suggests that it could grow by 175.9%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than BigCommerce Holdings, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than BigCommerce Holdings.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.26%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WM Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WM Technology pays out 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $82.4M, which are larger than WM Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$353K is lower than WM Technology's net income of $1.6M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WM Technology's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.14x versus 0.51x for WM Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.