BKTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harmonic has a net margin of 11.19% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of 4.46%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.47%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $10.93 which suggests that it could grow by 19.83%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Harmonic.

BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.533%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $133.1M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M is lower than Harmonic's net income of $5.9M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.99x versus 1.54x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inseego has a net margin of 11.19% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of -4.96%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85% beat Inseego's return on equity of --.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.47%. On the other hand Inseego has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 53.95%. Given that Inseego has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Inseego is more attractive than BK Technologies.

BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inseego has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.098%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inseego offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inseego pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Inseego quarterly revenues of $31.7M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M is higher than Inseego's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Inseego's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.99x versus 0.52x for Inseego. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 11.19% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of 6.85%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of 0.73%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.47%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.29%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Viavi Solutions, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Viavi Solutions.

BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.807%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $284.8M. BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M is lower than Viavi Solutions's net income of $19.5M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is 505.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.99x versus 2.17x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viasat has a net margin of 11.19% compared to BK Technologies's net margin of -21.45%. BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85% beat Viasat's return on equity of -11.66%.

BK Technologies has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.47%. On the other hand Viasat has an analysts' consensus of $18.29 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Viasat, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Viasat.

BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viasat has a beta of 1.171, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.117%.

BK Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viasat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BK Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viasat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BK Technologies quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Viasat quarterly revenues of $1.1B. BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M is higher than Viasat's net income of -$246.1M. Notably, BK Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.72x while Viasat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BK Technologies is 1.99x versus 0.44x for Viasat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.