HLIT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 11.19%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $10.93, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.47%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.873%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is higher than BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 15.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.54x versus 1.99x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 26.77%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -66.89%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $10.93, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 77.87%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.383%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.8M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is lower than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.54x versus 0.15x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inseego has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -4.96%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat Inseego's return on equity of --.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $10.93, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Inseego has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 53.95%. Given that Inseego has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Inseego is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inseego has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.098%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inseego offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inseego pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than Inseego quarterly revenues of $31.7M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is higher than Inseego's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Inseego's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.54x versus 0.52x for Inseego. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viavi Solutions has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Harmonic's net margin of 6.85%. Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43% beat Viavi Solutions's return on equity of 0.73%.

Harmonic has a consensus price target of $10.93, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Viavi Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $12.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.29%. Given that Viavi Solutions has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Viavi Solutions is more attractive than Harmonic.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viavi Solutions has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.807%.

Harmonic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viavi Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harmonic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viavi Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harmonic quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Viavi Solutions quarterly revenues of $284.8M. Harmonic's net income of $5.9M is lower than Viavi Solutions's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Harmonic's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Viavi Solutions's PE ratio is 505.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harmonic is 1.54x versus 2.17x for Viavi Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.