BSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands has a net margin of 13.84% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of 33.19%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 19.6% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 4.15%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.78%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Black Stone Minerals LP has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Black Stone Minerals LP is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of -0.084, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.398%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.66%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 134.55% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $348.2K. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than CKX Lands's net income of $115.6K. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 32.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.20x versus 14.09x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum has a net margin of 13.84% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of -38.8%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 19.6% beat Empire Petroleum's return on equity of -56.67%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.78%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Black Stone Minerals LP has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum, analysts believe Black Stone Minerals LP is more attractive than Empire Petroleum.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.656%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.66%. Empire Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 134.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are larger than Empire Petroleum quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than Empire Petroleum's net income of -$4M. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while Empire Petroleum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.20x versus 3.02x for Empire Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Energy has a net margin of 13.84% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of -141.86%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 19.6% beat US Energy's return on equity of -57.76%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.78%. On the other hand US Energy has an analysts' consensus of $2.83 which suggests that it could grow by 117.95%. Given that US Energy has higher upside potential than Black Stone Minerals LP, analysts believe US Energy is more attractive than Black Stone Minerals LP.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Energy has a beta of 0.523, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.702%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.66%. US Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 134.55% of its earnings as a dividend. US Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are larger than US Energy quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than US Energy's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while US Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.20x versus 2.13x for US Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of 13.84% compared to Black Stone Minerals LP's net margin of 30.61%. Black Stone Minerals LP's return on equity of 19.6% beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.78%. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.56%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Black Stone Minerals LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Black Stone Minerals LP.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.235% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.713%.

Black Stone Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.66%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 6.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Black Stone Minerals LP pays 134.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Stone Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are smaller than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $245M. Black Stone Minerals LP's net income of $15.9M is lower than Viper Energy's net income of $75M. Notably, Black Stone Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.99x while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 9.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Stone Minerals LP is 6.20x versus 4.16x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.