LIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Life360's net margin of -9.99%. Life360's return on equity of 2.93% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Life360 has a consensus price target of $61.29, signalling downside risk potential of -13%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $479.85 which suggests that it could grow by 2%. Given that CrowdStrike Holdings has higher upside potential than Life360, analysts believe CrowdStrike Holdings is more attractive than Life360.

Life360 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.732%.

Life360 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Life360 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Life360 quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Life360's net income of $4.4M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Life360's price-to-earnings ratio is 640.36x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Life360 is 13.81x versus 28.21x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dave has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Life360's net margin of 26.68%. Life360's return on equity of 2.93% beat Dave's return on equity of 32.47%.

Life360 has a consensus price target of $61.29, signalling downside risk potential of -13%. On the other hand Dave has an analysts' consensus of $237.25 which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that Dave has higher upside potential than Life360, analysts believe Dave is more attractive than Life360.

Life360 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Life360 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Life360 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Life360 quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are smaller than Dave quarterly revenues of $108M. Life360's net income of $4.4M is lower than Dave's net income of $28.8M. Notably, Life360's price-to-earnings ratio is 640.36x while Dave's PE ratio is 52.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Life360 is 13.81x versus 7.09x for Dave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Life360's net margin of -4.72%. Life360's return on equity of 2.93% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Life360 has a consensus price target of $61.29, signalling downside risk potential of -13%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 160.62%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Life360, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Life360.

Life360 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

Life360 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Life360 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Life360 quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Life360's net income of $4.4M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Life360's price-to-earnings ratio is 640.36x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Life360 is 13.81x versus 0.78x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Life360's net margin of 36.86%. Life360's return on equity of 2.93% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Life360 has a consensus price target of $61.29, signalling downside risk potential of -13%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $533.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Life360, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Life360.

Life360 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Life360 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Life360 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Life360 quarterly revenues are $103.6M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Life360's net income of $4.4M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Life360's price-to-earnings ratio is 640.36x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Life360 is 13.81x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.