CRWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -9.99% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 36.86%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $479.85, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $533.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 28.21x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -9.99% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of -8.03%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -7.97%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $479.85, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $164.71 which suggests that it could fall by -13.22%. Given that CrowdStrike Holdings has higher upside potential than Cloudflare, analysts believe CrowdStrike Holdings is more attractive than Cloudflare.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.850, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.985%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $479.1M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M is lower than Cloudflare's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 28.21x versus 36.80x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -9.99% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 9.01%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61% beat Okta's return on equity of 2.08%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $479.85, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $122.36 which suggests that it could grow by 34.36%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.797%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $688M. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M is lower than Okta's net income of $62M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Okta's PE ratio is 144.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 28.21x versus 6.10x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -9.99% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings's net margin of 3.04%. CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a consensus price target of $479.85, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $296.88 which suggests that it could grow by 30.94%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.122%.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CrowdStrike Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M is lower than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, CrowdStrike Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 765.02x while Workday's PE ratio is 125.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CrowdStrike Holdings is 28.21x versus 7.02x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.