EXFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -8.79% compared to Expensify's net margin of 24.04%. Expensify's return on equity of -7.83% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Expensify has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.79%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $315.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.02%. Given that Expensify has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Expensify is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Expensify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.887%.

Expensify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Expensify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expensify quarterly revenues are $36.1M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Expensify's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Expensify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expensify is 1.34x versus 6.45x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -8.79% compared to Expensify's net margin of 9.31%. Expensify's return on equity of -7.83% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Expensify has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.79%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $340.21 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Expensify has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Expensify is more attractive than Autodesk.

Expensify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.944%.

Expensify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expensify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expensify quarterly revenues are $36.1M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Expensify's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Expensify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 61.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expensify is 1.34x versus 9.89x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -8.79% compared to Expensify's net margin of -4.72%. Expensify's return on equity of -7.83% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Expensify has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.79%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 160.62%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Expensify, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Expensify.

Expensify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

Expensify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expensify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expensify quarterly revenues are $36.1M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Expensify's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Expensify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expensify is 1.34x versus 0.78x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WM Technology has a net margin of -8.79% compared to Expensify's net margin of 3.69%. Expensify's return on equity of -7.83% beat WM Technology's return on equity of 7%.

Expensify has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.79%. On the other hand WM Technology has an analysts' consensus of $2.61 which suggests that it could grow by 175.9%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Expensify, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Expensify.

Expensify has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.26%.

Expensify has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WM Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expensify pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WM Technology pays out 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Expensify quarterly revenues are $36.1M, which are smaller than WM Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. Expensify's net income of -$3.2M is lower than WM Technology's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Expensify's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WM Technology's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expensify is 1.34x versus 0.51x for WM Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.