COMM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 70.49% compared to CommScope Holding's net margin of 26.77%. CommScope Holding's return on equity of -- beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -66.89%.

CommScope Holding has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling downside risk potential of -32.09%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 77.87%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.376, which suggesting that the stock is 137.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.383%.

CommScope Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommScope Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

CommScope Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.8M. CommScope Holding's net income of $784M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of $33.9M. Notably, CommScope Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.75x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommScope Holding is 0.36x versus 0.15x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fortive has a net margin of 70.49% compared to CommScope Holding's net margin of 11.66%. CommScope Holding's return on equity of -- beat Fortive's return on equity of 7.67%.

CommScope Holding has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling downside risk potential of -32.09%. On the other hand Fortive has an analysts' consensus of $67.27 which suggests that it could grow by 33.68%. Given that Fortive has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Fortive is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.376, which suggesting that the stock is 137.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortive has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.959%.

CommScope Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fortive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CommScope Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortive pays out 13.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CommScope Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Fortive quarterly revenues of $1.5B. CommScope Holding's net income of $784M is higher than Fortive's net income of $171.9M. Notably, CommScope Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.75x while Fortive's PE ratio is 22.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommScope Holding is 0.36x versus 2.85x for Fortive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of 70.49% compared to CommScope Holding's net margin of 4.46%. CommScope Holding's return on equity of -- beat Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43%.

CommScope Holding has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling downside risk potential of -32.09%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $10.93 which suggests that it could grow by 19.83%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.376, which suggesting that the stock is 137.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.533%.

CommScope Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommScope Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommScope Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $133.1M. CommScope Holding's net income of $784M is higher than Harmonic's net income of $5.9M. Notably, CommScope Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.75x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommScope Holding is 0.36x versus 1.54x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viasat has a net margin of 70.49% compared to CommScope Holding's net margin of -21.45%. CommScope Holding's return on equity of -- beat Viasat's return on equity of -11.66%.

CommScope Holding has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling downside risk potential of -32.09%. On the other hand Viasat has an analysts' consensus of $18.29 which suggests that it could grow by 19.13%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.376, which suggesting that the stock is 137.561% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viasat has a beta of 1.171, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.117%.

CommScope Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viasat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CommScope Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viasat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CommScope Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Viasat quarterly revenues of $1.1B. CommScope Holding's net income of $784M is higher than Viasat's net income of -$246.1M. Notably, CommScope Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.75x while Viasat's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CommScope Holding is 0.36x versus 0.44x for Viasat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.