WMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 6.29%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.65%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 6.27%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.59 which suggests that it could grow by 29.54%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.035%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 7.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $21B. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.64x versus 0.73x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 6.48%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 33.43%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 6.27%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $264.47 which suggests that it could grow by 14.24%. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.423, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.696%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is higher than Cheniere Energy's net income of $353M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 16.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.64x versus 3.10x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of -41.95%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -27.66%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 6.27%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $5.42 which suggests that it could grow by 35.08%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.157%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $470.5M. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is higher than New Fortress Energy's net income of -$197.4M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.64x versus 0.44x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vonage Holdings has a net margin of 22.67% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of --. Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38% beat Vonage Holdings's return on equity of --.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 6.27%. On the other hand Vonage Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Williams Companies has higher upside potential than Vonage Holdings, analysts believe Williams Companies is more attractive than Vonage Holdings.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vonage Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Vonage Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Vonage Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Vonage Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Williams Companies's net income of $691M is higher than Vonage Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while Vonage Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.64x versus -- for Vonage Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.