NFE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Excelerate Energy has a net margin of -41.95% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 15.54%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -27.66% beat Excelerate Energy's return on equity of 4.03%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $5.42, signalling upside risk potential of 35.08%. On the other hand Excelerate Energy has an analysts' consensus of $33.55 which suggests that it could grow by 27.45%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Excelerate Energy, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Excelerate Energy.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelerate Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Excelerate Energy offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy pays out 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $470.5M, which are larger than Excelerate Energy quarterly revenues of $315.1M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$197.4M is lower than Excelerate Energy's net income of $49M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Excelerate Energy's PE ratio is 17.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.44x versus 1.25x for Excelerate Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of -41.95% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 6.29%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -27.66% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.65%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $5.42, signalling upside risk potential of 35.08%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.59 which suggests that it could grow by 29.54%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Transfer LP, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Energy Transfer LP.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.035%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 7.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $470.5M, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $21B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$197.4M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.3B. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.44x versus 0.73x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of -41.95% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 6.48%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -27.66% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 33.43%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $5.42, signalling upside risk potential of 35.08%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $264.47 which suggests that it could grow by 14.24%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Cheniere Energy.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.423, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.696%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $470.5M, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$197.4M is lower than Cheniere Energy's net income of $353M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 16.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.44x versus 3.10x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams Companies has a net margin of -41.95% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 22.67%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -27.66% beat Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $5.42, signalling upside risk potential of 35.08%. On the other hand Williams Companies has an analysts' consensus of $62.15 which suggests that it could grow by 6.27%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.157% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams Companies has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.482%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams Companies offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies pays out 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $470.5M, which are smaller than Williams Companies quarterly revenues of $3B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$197.4M is lower than Williams Companies's net income of $691M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Williams Companies's PE ratio is 31.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.44x versus 6.64x for Williams Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.