PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 11.87%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $147.70, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 16.08%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than PepsiCo.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.1%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.01x versus 1.29x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 29.92%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $147.70, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.79 which suggests that it could grow by 12.15%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than PepsiCo.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.785%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.1%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 27.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.01x versus 6.39x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 4.32%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.15%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $147.70, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $72.93 which suggests that it could grow by 9.27%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Mondelez International, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Mondelez International.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.162%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.1%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than Mondelez International's net income of $402M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 24.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.01x versus 2.44x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 23.89%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $147.70, signalling upside risk potential of 10.38%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $62.5096 which suggests that it could grow by 6.06%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.589, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.066%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.1%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.68x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 36.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.01x versus 7.88x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.