KO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.22%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.79, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.49 which suggests that it could grow by 17.57%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.543%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.74x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 29.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.39x versus 2.87x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 23.89%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.79, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $62.5096 which suggests that it could grow by 6.06%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.589, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.066%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.74x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 36.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.39x versus 7.88x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 10.24%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.79, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $147.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.38%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than PepsiCo.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.552%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.74x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.39x versus 2.01x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellation Brands has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 20.52%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of -5.33%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.79, signalling upside risk potential of 12.15%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $210.01 which suggests that it could grow by 26.52%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.025%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Constellation Brands's net income of $516.1M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.74x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 49.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.39x versus 2.98x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.