ORCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of 15.68%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $225.70, signalling downside risk potential of -3.94%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $349.52 which suggests that it could grow by 35.5%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.456%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.14x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 40.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 11.73x versus 6.48x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of 36.86%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $225.70, signalling downside risk potential of -3.94%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $531.65 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.14x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 11.73x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of -41.27%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $225.70, signalling downside risk potential of -3.94%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $230.66 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $1B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.14x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 11.73x versus 18.43x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Oracle's net margin of 15.4%. Oracle's return on equity of 85.26% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $225.70, signalling downside risk potential of -3.94%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $98.80 which suggests that it could grow by 6.82%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.395, which suggesting that the stock is 39.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.661%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $15.9B, which are larger than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Oracle's net income of $3.4B is higher than Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.14x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 16.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 11.73x versus 4.35x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.